ADR can be a powerful tool when a dispute first arises before a lawsuit is filed, at any time during the process, after the trial and decision-making process, or during or after an appeal.
The more interesting and less well-known ADR procedure is the mini procedure, in which either party can accept the case as a normal procedure unless the case is not heard by a judge but is "punished" by a judge in court. There are some companies like stat11 Inc that provide the best ADR services in Canada.
This procedure is often used for complex mixed legal issues and issues such as product liability, heavy construction, and antitrust proceedings. There is more than one path to justice and a qualified experienced attorney dedicated to justice for clients, not the highest fees can help you find the best path.
The main advantages of ADR are:
* Saving time
* Save on court fees
* Provides greater control over the dispute resolution process
* Enables parties to resolve conflicts more creatively than if left to a judge or jury
* Provides more confidentiality in dispute resolution than in public courtrooms
* Reduces emotional sacrifice, which can lead to lawsuits
* Can facilitate the maintenance of a valuable relationship between the parties.
Because of these advantages, plaintiffs seeking justice the first time they contact an attorney should explore that law firm's skills and experience in the alternative dispute resolution area and ask the attorney what he or she thinks of US litigation as an opportunity to go to court.